EU cluster policy criticised


By Desmond Hinton-Beales
- 13th June 2011
Europe has added thousands of cluster organisations, but we are not necessarily better off

Emiliano Duch

Cluster management initiatives are little more than "lobbying organisations" if they fail to create new business models, a conference has heard.

Emiliano Duch, coordinator of the European cluster excellence initiative, made the comments in Debrecen, Hungary, at the week of innovative regions in Europe (Wire 2011) conference.

Duch criticised the EU's approach to cluster policy, saying that the model exists because of the European "innovation gap" not because they are "good or bad".

"Europe has added thousands of cluster organisations, but we are not necessarily better off," he said.

Duch warned that creating organisations does not create innovation and that the issue is "more complex" than that.

"We need to know what is a good cluster and a bad cluster," he said, adding that the US developed areas such as silicon valley without any state funding or cluster policy.

"Clusters are a tool to put order in the policies, not an end in themselves."

He also criticised the funding of cluster policies, saying that Philips electronics has changed the name of its research department to continue receiving cluster money.

However Ronald de Bruin, the acting director of the European Institute of Technology, felt that clusters can be a "catalyst for a step change in EU innovation capacity".

Clusters are "highly integrated, creative and excellence-driven autonomous partnerships", he said.

Csaba Novak, director of strategy and international relations at the MAG-Hungarian economic development centre, said that cluster analysis must be improved as there "is a lack of unified language and approaches" and standardisation must be taken seriously.

Novak said that clusters can be an "efficient policy tool if properly used", but added that cluster management was a key factor of any success.

Related News

Public private partnerships key to growth of EU pharma research

Campaigners press for 'fundamental change' at EU food agency

EU ombudsman opens investigation into bee mortality

EU commission urged to be 'more ambitious' on digital technology

Major EU-wide trial launched into stroke research



Latest news

Concern over incoming Cypriot presidency dismissed as 'manufactured'

British S&D member Richard Howitt has branded concerns about the upcoming Cypriot presidency of the EU as "manufactured"


EU urged to do more to combat homophobic bullying

Senior MEP Edward McMillan-Scott says "much remains to be done" to improve the rights of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender people


Ukraine premier says he 'welcomes' EU election observers

Ukrainian prime minister Mykola Azarov says he would welcome the presence of observers from the EU during the country's national elections later this year


Ireland made 'fundamental mistake' in joining single currency


EU funds helping to 'prop up' corrupt regimes


Shamed MEP tells of 'bitterness' over 'cash-for-laws' scandal


Ukraine PM attempts to defuse tension over Tymoshenko case


EU accused of driving bluefin tuna to 'brink of extinction'


Article Comments

My partners of i.con. innovation (Stuttgart, DE) and I are active in innovation management since 25 years, and have seen many clusters set up with public money in Germany and Europe. Our impression is much the same as stated by Mr. Duch. Clusters are successful if started bottom up from industry initiative. Policy induced clusters are doing of course a lot to justify their existence towards policy makers (image brochures, public events etc.), but are not necessarily adding substantial value to the industrial innovation processes.

Udo Sievers
14th Jun 2011 at 12:56 pm

More from Dods