EU cluster policy criticised

Bookmark and Share

By Desmond Hinton-Beales
- 13th June 2011
Europe has added thousands of cluster organisations, but we are not necessarily better off

Emiliano Duch

Cluster management initiatives are little more than "lobbying organisations" if they fail to create new business models, a conference has heard.

Emiliano Duch, coordinator of the European cluster excellence initiative, made the comments in Debrecen, Hungary, at the week of innovative regions in Europe (Wire 2011) conference.

Duch criticised the EU's approach to cluster policy, saying that the model exists because of the European "innovation gap" not because they are "good or bad".

"Europe has added thousands of cluster organisations, but we are not necessarily better off," he said.

Duch warned that creating organisations does not create innovation and that the issue is "more complex" than that.

"We need to know what is a good cluster and a bad cluster," he said, adding that the US developed areas such as silicon valley without any state funding or cluster policy.

"Clusters are a tool to put order in the policies, not an end in themselves."

He also criticised the funding of cluster policies, saying that Philips electronics has changed the name of its research department to continue receiving cluster money.

However Ronald de Bruin, the acting director of the European Institute of Technology, felt that clusters can be a "catalyst for a step change in EU innovation capacity".

Clusters are "highly integrated, creative and excellence-driven autonomous partnerships", he said.

Csaba Novak, director of strategy and international relations at the MAG-Hungarian economic development centre, said that cluster analysis must be improved as there "is a lack of unified language and approaches" and standardisation must be taken seriously.

Novak said that clusters can be an "efficient policy tool if properly used", but added that cluster management was a key factor of any success.

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Public private partnerships key to growth of EU pharma research

Campaigners press for 'fundamental change' at EU food agency

EU ombudsman opens investigation into bee mortality

EU commission urged to be 'more ambitious' on digital technology

Major EU-wide trial launched into stroke research



Latest news

MEPs overwhelmingly back resolution on gay rights

Parliament has overwhelmingly adopted a resolution to condemn homophobic laws and discrimination in Europe


MEP calls for health treatment to switch from 'treatment to prevention'

A conference in Brussels heard that 40 per cent of Europeans aged over 15 have a chronic disease


MEPs call for 'tuna sanctuaries' to help preserve stocks

Parliament has adopted new legislation, implementing internationally-agreed rules on bluefin tuna fishing


EU urged to do more to promote missing children hotline


MEPs hit out at attempts to 'water down' code of conduct


Taiwan steps up campaign to become full WHA member


Parliament endorses EU-wide FTT


EU leaders urged to reject 'failed' austerity measures


Article Comments

My partners of i.con. innovation (Stuttgart, DE) and I are active in innovation management since 25 years, and have seen many clusters set up with public money in Germany and Europe. Our impression is much the same as stated by Mr. Duch. Clusters are successful if started bottom up from industry initiative. Policy induced clusters are doing of course a lot to justify their existence towards policy makers (image brochures, public events etc.), but are not necessarily adding substantial value to the industrial innovation processes.

Udo Sievers
14th Jun 2011 at 12:56 pm

More from Dods