EU defends 'balanced and pragmatic' GM policy

Bookmark and Share

By Martin Banks
- 16th September 2010
This is a growing movement and many people have deep concerns about GMOs

Jill Evans

European health commissioner John Dalli has defended the EU's policy on GMOs, saying it is "balanced and pragmatic".

His comments come as the commission prepares to table new legislative proposals for the cultivation of GMOs.

Speaking at a conference in parliament on Thursday, Dalli said the EU employed "one of the strictest" systems for authorising GMOs. This included a "zero tolerance" approach to unauthorised GMOs.

Dalli added, "This is a system that is based on science, safety and consumer choice."

He also defended the commission's proposal to leave decisions on GMO planting to member states, saying, "Our new guidelines strike the right balance between GM and non-GM farming.

"They give member states a say on the cultivation of GM crops and, I believe, send the right signal to the consumer. We needed more flexibility here and this is what these guidelines seek to achieve."

Another speaker, French MEP José Bové, deputy chair of the agriculture committee, said he was "dissatisfied" with the commission's proposals, warning they would effectively "renationalise" GM cultivation.

Both Dalli and Bové were addressing a GMO-Free Europe conference, jointly organised by Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth Europe.

The event brought together some 250 participants, including farmers, consumer and civil society organisations from 37 countries.

Jill Evans, a Welsh MEP who chaired the opening debate, said the strong turnout "shows the strength of feeling" on the GMO issue.

She said, "This is a growing movement and many people have deep concerns about GMOs."

In the last few years Europe has experienced two major foods scares: bovine spongiform encephalopathy (mad cow disease) in the UK and dioxin-tainted foods originating from Belgium.

For some, such food scares have undermined consumer confidence in the European food supply, with citizens disinclined to trust government information about GM foods.

In response to the public outcry, Europe now requires mandatory food labelling of GM foods in stores, and the commission has established a one per cent threshold for contamination of unmodified foods with GM food products.

Environmental activists, religious organisations, public interest groups, professional associations, scientists and government officials have all raised concerns about GM foods.

Their effects on human health are unknown and there is a growing concern that introducing foreign genes into food plants may have unexpected and negative impacts on human health.

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

EU accused of driving bluefin tuna to 'brink of extinction'

Fisheries ministers meet to thrash out CFP reform

Campaigners press for 'fundamental change' at EU food agency

Scottish minister condemns 'irresponsible' behaviour over 'mackerel wars'

Commissioner says CFP reform is 'on right track'



Latest news

MEPs overwhelmingly back resolution on gay rights

Parliament has overwhelmingly adopted a resolution to condemn homophobic laws and discrimination in Europe


MEP calls for health treatment to switch from 'treatment to prevention'

A conference in Brussels heard that 40 per cent of Europeans aged over 15 have a chronic disease


MEPs call for 'tuna sanctuaries' to help preserve stocks

Parliament has adopted new legislation, implementing internationally-agreed rules on bluefin tuna fishing


EU urged to do more to promote missing children hotline


MEPs hit out at attempts to 'water down' code of conduct


Taiwan steps up campaign to become full WHA member


Parliament endorses EU-wide FTT


EU leaders urged to reject 'failed' austerity measures


Article Comments

We have no evidence of significant damage from the use of the precise techniques of modern biotechnology. So why do we have legislation, regulations and court cases on matters which, according to the precautionary principle, offer far less reason for concern than the current and growing problems of food supply and safety across the world? And why on earth does the European commission subsidise such games? This simply brings the EU institutions into contempt.

Mark Cantley
5th Oct 2010 at 9:35 pm

John Dalli completely fails to appreciate that European consumer groups and other NGOs have a deep mistrust of EFSA. The commission wants EFSA to have increased power in the assessment of "the science" relating to the safety of GMOs, and it wants the agency to have extra powers which will enable fast-track GMO approvals to take place.This is happening at a time when new research shows that GMOs are harmful to health.These absurd commission proposals for the reform of the GM assessment process must be dropped, and there must be a moratorium on all future GMO assessments and approvals until "the science" of GM safety has been fully and independently assessed.

Brian John
17th Sep 2010 at 7:22 am

EuropaBio agrees with commissioner Dalli: Europe's system is "based on science, safety and consumer choice".Unfortunately, that choice does not yet extend to farmers in Europe.

Molly Hurley-Dépret
16th Sep 2010 at 5:39 pm

More from Dods