EU parliament rejects call for harmonised pensions

Bookmark and Share

By Martin Banks
- 3rd February 2011
I am pleased we have made it clear that member states retain full responsibility for their own pension systems

Liz Lynne

MEPs have rejected controversial calls for a minimum pension to be set at EU level.

At a meeting, the employment and social affairs committee threw out the demand, one of over 400 amendments made to a parliamentary report.

The report, "Towards adequate, sustainable and safe European pension systems" was drafted by Dutch MEP Ria Oomen-Ruijten and marks parliament's response to a commission review of EU pension policy.

The commission says that, at present, there are four people of working age for every person over 65 but by 2060 there will be just two.

Some 463 amendments were voted on during the mammoth meeting on Tuesday.

Members said the EU and member states "must act" to ensure that pension schemes can sustainably deliver an "adequate" income to the EU's growing number of retired people, despite the economic crisis.

MEPs also voiced concern at the widening gap between the statutory pension age (which is under review in some countries) and the actual age at which many stop work.

Older workers would benefit from better adapted workplaces and working conditions, as well as improved protection against dismissal, they said.

Oomen-Ruijten said, "Although member states have the lead, there are aspects where coordination at European level is important.

"The ageing of the population has a big impact because not all member states have put money aside for their pensions.

"This could lead to enormous expenses which will have consequences for the stability and growth pact. The supervising authority should monitor pension systems and some member states must be encouraged to foresee a safe and adequate pension system."

Further comment came from UK ALDE member Liz Lynne who said, "I am pleased we have made it clear that member states retain full responsibility for their own pension systems."

"Some had called for an agreement on a way forward for a minimum pension to be set at EU level, but thankfully these calls were resisted.

"Any move towards further regulation would have been madness given the different pension traditions and economies in each member state."

"While we can share best practice at EU level and learn from each other more effectively, the Lisbon treaty makes it clear that it is member states, not the EU, who are responsible for pension provision."

Meanwhile, a plenary session of the Committee of the Regions was told that budget cuts in member states should not "diminish" their responsibilities to provide adequate pensions.

Flemish parliamentarian Mia De Vits said, "People's pensions can no longer be subject to financial market speculation."

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Irish voters urged to back EU fiscal treaty

Row flares between MEPs over human rights report

UK government criticised over proposed ECHR reforms

EU citizens' initiative hailed as 'agenda-setting' tool

Mixed response to new EU fiscal treaty



Latest news

MEPs overwhelmingly back resolution on gay rights

Parliament has overwhelmingly adopted a resolution to condemn homophobic laws and discrimination in Europe


MEP calls for health treatment to switch from 'treatment to prevention'

A conference in Brussels heard that 40 per cent of Europeans aged over 15 have a chronic disease


MEPs call for 'tuna sanctuaries' to help preserve stocks

Parliament has adopted new legislation, implementing internationally-agreed rules on bluefin tuna fishing


EU urged to do more to promote missing children hotline


MEPs hit out at attempts to 'water down' code of conduct


Taiwan steps up campaign to become full WHA member


Parliament endorses EU-wide FTT


EU leaders urged to reject 'failed' austerity measures


More from Dods