Funding controls ‘looser’ under EU budget deal

Bookmark and Share

By Bruno Waterfield
- 24th January 2006

New European financing proposals from national governments will weaken Brussels spending controls and increase potential abuse of funding, EU officials have warned.

Europe’s leaders agreed changes to the workings of ‘cohesion’ expenditure targeted at the EU’s poorest regions as part of a deal on budgets for 2007 to 2013.

But EU officials warn the new rules will relax Brussels vigilance and weaken accountability on the spending of European funds.

“These rules will make financial discipline looser,” said a senior European commission official on Tuesday.

Commission officials are particularly angry that in the run-up to December EU budget negotiations, national governments rejected tighter accounting rules.

Brussels has urged member states to play a more active role in ensuring that European money is properly allocated after criticism of the current system by the European Court of Auditors.

The ECA has failed to give a ‘positive statement of assurance’ on the EU accounts for the last 11 years, mainly because of a lack of transparency at the national level.

European commission President José Manuel Barroso has made no secret of his desire to obtain a positive statement of assurance from the ECA before the end of his tenure.

National governments distribute 80 per cent of the EU’s annual budget, mainly in the form of farm subsidies or ‘structural funds’ targeted at Europe’s poorest regions.

But it is the commission that is responsible for ensuring that the EU money is correctly spent and officials complain that any blame will be laid on the Brussels doorstep.

“It is a bit rich for governments to refuse national rules but then to open up funds to potential abuse while leaving the commission weakened,” said another EU official.

New EU funding rules for structural funds are applicable for new member states, Greece and Portugal – the biggest spenders – and allow countries longer to spend funds on a wider scope of projects.

Officials are particularly concerned that funds can be earmarked for “housing” in the new EU10 - and in Romania and Bulgaria when the pair join the EU in 2007.

Bookmark and Share

Have your say...

Please enter your comments below.

Name

Your e-mail address


Listen to audio version

Please type in the letters or numbers shown above (case sensitive)

Related News

Citizens may be compelled to appear before EU parliament

Row flares over possible flag plans

New pensions authority boss sets out stall for job

Commissioner defends EU staff pension provision

EU urged to review pension provision for its staff



Latest news

EU urged to avoid 'pressurising' India at summit

A leading charity is calling on the EU 'not to pressurise' India into agreeing new trade rules at a key summit in New Delhi on Friday


MEPs brand EU fisheries policy as 'catastrophic'

MEPs have described a new report by European auditors on the EU's management of fish stocks as "damning"


Hungary's media laws branded 'deeply troubling'

EU commissioner Neelie Kroes has launched a withering verbal attack on Hungary's media laws, branding them as "deeply troubling"


EU 'must protect consumers' from excessive roaming charges


Leading commission official allays fears of '1930s-style slump'


McMillan-Scott lambasts China for its 'abhorrent' record


Veteran UK deputy appointed rapporteur on controversial ACTA dossier


Homeless people 'excluded' from European rights


More from Dods